**There has been a great deal written about Khan Academy just recently and the concept of personalised instruction and how this is somehow revolutionary or some sort of game changer. But why is it engaging at all? Where does this type of instruction lead us?**

In my opinion the instructional maths videos posted on the Khan Academy are “resources” and the structure surrounding it suggests some sort of recipe for how to best use it. We might call this the “pedagogy” as this term refers to strategies or styles of instruction – and the full-fat version of Khan Academy use has it’s own style, heavily tilted towards personalised instruction and feedback.

Looking at the videos as stand alone resources or items that could be used to support teaching and learning in the classroom – how do you rate them? In my opinion they are not particularly engaging – just a close up version of what you see on a board. In my teaching of maths at primary level I wouldn’t use them directly to support my teaching – I might at a push use them as additional materials for children to access – but I may as well do it myself. So if the videos don’t have anything engaging in them, it must be somewhere else, right?

The Khan Academy is a dressed up YouTube channel and purportedly the statistical tracking and indication of “progress” is what is driving any sense of engagement. So are students engaged in the maths or the pointification? Well if the instructional clips aren’t edge of the seat stuff it must be the notional suggestion of a game that drives clicks and engagement.

My son is just learning to read and he is also learning some spellings, he is 5 years old. He gets about 6 spellings to learn at a time – I have always found spelling strategies and policies that are “learn this word” to be utterly pointless and frustrating. This is similar to learning basic maths too – if George sounds out a word whilst he is reading or trying to write and is using that word in context, he is making a much deeper connection with that concept than if he attempts to learn it on it’s own.

Another off shoot of this list / drill approach is that parents cling on to the score, the outcome, the stats (that are everywhere in the Khan Academy) and as a result begin to build this mentality about what achievement is in school. It is a grade – a score out of 10. No context. We have a cultural fascination with grades and I don’t think Khan Academy does anything but strengthen this fervent point of view.

**Seth Godin suggests that it is long overdue to actually create something with these tools – “Knowing about a tool is one thing. Having the guts to use it in a way that brings art to the world is another. Perhaps we need to spend less time learning new tools and more time using them.”**

During the last 7 months I have been exploring design thinking as a style of instruction and as a structure to plan curricula that is meaningful and relevant to children. We have had the opportunity to work with a wide range of schools and teachers at all age levels in rethinking their approach to the curriculum. As Ewan puts it:

“it’s not about instruction-giving, the very basis of traditional teaching or “instruction”. It’s about providing structures within which people can operate, structures that use different constraints, not fewer constraints, to achieve more choice and therefore breadth of learning, collaboration and depth of learning.”

This approach has a huge emphasis on the role of the student in their curriculum, they play a vital role in what gets planned and how this plays out in their experience of school. Dan Meyer, a former maths teacher, touches on this approach to curriculum content in his TEDxNYED talk.

What Salman Khan is missing is the connection with the real life around us, that which Dan explores, the context that we need to fully engage in difficult conceptual knowledge. A child using Khan Academy will be able to get a personalised set of exercises, tailored just for them, but not the meaningful choice driven application of those ideas.

Dan Meyer explains that providing students with a real life example of a mathematical challenge levels the playing field for all students as it is more about intuitive problem discovery than spoon feeding text book style. Gever Tulley, the creator of the Tinkering School, explains this succinctly by suggesting that:

**“The opportunities for engaged learning are inversely proportional to the knowability of the outcome.”**

When we know the outcome of our work, if we have too rigid an outcome in our mind for the topic we are working on, our students are likely to be less engaged. (From the video above you can see Dan restructuring a problem with this in mind.)

To me this refers to the “guess the answer in the teacher’s head” syndrome, which when expanded can (sadly) apply to the whole curriculum topic for weeks an weeks of school. We are all making a musical instrument as that is what we have always done.

I don’t see how Khan Academy can have a place in a creative curriculum model, at least not the model of instruction used, the resources themselves may have some value. But it all seems to be propping up a model that should be vanishing from our schools, not resurfacing.

**Resources such as these will just make teachers think that they are taking innovative approaches to their teaching and learning. It will stall the changes that are needed in many schools across the world to make maths and other curriculum subjects more meaningful and engaging – we need more “problem finders“, critical thinkers and indeed children developing the capacity to become “patient problem solvers”. We don’t need games and points to bring rote, de-contextualised, meaningless styles of learning back from the abyss where they should rest – we should be kicking them back over the edge!**

**Dave Gibbs, a teacher and consultant from the UK summed this up really well: “To me it (Khan Academy) seems like a new way of teaching the old way. Not fit for today’s learners, or indeed teachers.”**

Students like Kahn Academy because Sal is a better teacher than most teachers in the world. He makes subjects easy by starting with an analogy/goal and the simplest examples possible.

Background: I’m an engineer and I’ve been using Khan Academy since it came out.

Go drink your haterade hater.

I have been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles

or weblog posts in this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I at

last stumbled upon this web site. Studying this information So i am glad to convey that I’ve a very good uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed.

I such a lot undoubtedly will make certain to don?t omit this web

site and provides it a look regularly.

I do not even know the way I finished up here, but I thought this submit used to be good.

I do not realize who you might be however definitely you are

going to a well-known blogger should you are not already.

Cheers!

Greetings from Carolina! I’m bored at work so I decided to browse your website on my iphone during lunch

break. I enjoy the information you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.

I’m shocked at how fast your blog loaded on my phone ..

I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, great site!

This is the perfect site for everyone who wants to find out about this topic.

You know a whole lot its almost tough to argue with you (not that I actually will need to…HaHa).

You certainly put a fresh spin on a subject that has been written about for

decades. Wonderful stuff, just excellent!

Every student is unique. There is no one approach that will suit every student. Khan Academy is wonderful. This is a sour grapes article.

[…] http://edte.ch/blog/2011/12/06/khan-academy-is-not-the-progressive-model-you-are-looking-for/ […]

This is very interesting. Thank you for the post. Please amend the erroneous apostrophe in its in the first paragraph. It’s = it is.

Thank you.

[…] until I read Tom Barratt’s post this morning that I realised why – “Khan Academy Is Not The Progressive Model You Are Looking For”. With everyone talking it up and extolling the amazing virtues of using YouTube in this way I […]

[…] continues mais nulle part dérivables…). Tom Barrett exprime lui aussi cette idée dans un article récent […]

Silver bullets don’t exist – we’d like them to but they don’t. Point is it provides a learning resource, freely available at any time, to anybody, that wasn’t there before. Learners will determine how they use it – as practice, as an alternative explanation, as a way of solving a problem, or just curiosity. Teachers will adopt a similarly flexible approach – if they’re smart about it.

[…] Academy have been praised for engaging students through gamification. Critics, though, say that students simply respond to recorded lectures and exercises rather than create and self-discover. While it effectively teaching procedures, it fails to teach […]

Say what you want – I am an MIT graduate and Khan Academy got me through differential algebra and calculus. That guy is a godsend.

Have you actually WATCHED the Khan videos? In the first 8 Micro Economics videos he uses both real life examples AND opportunity for student practice and teacher interaction is provided.

[…] read an article today explaining how Khan Academy isn’t quite what we expect. I think it depends on just […]

Wellness Clinic Roswell…[…]Khan Academy Is Not The Progressive Model You Are Looking For | edte.ch[…]…

Tanie Kwatery…[…]Khan Academy Is Not The Progressive Model You Are Looking For | edte.ch[…]…

[…] http://edte.ch/blog/2011/12/06/khan-academy-is-not-the-progressive-model-you-are-looking-for/ […]

yeah, whoever wrote this article missed the point. Khan didn’t develop the idea of exploratory videos. He also is developing physical schools. And how about the fact that he totally understands the connection to a video game console based format. (X-Box Live achievements?) I’m sorry you can’t see why that might motivate kids.

[…] Khan Academy Is Not The Progressive Model You Are Looking For Barrett, Tom. EdTe.ch. Dec 6, 2011. […]

[…] Does Not Constitute an Education Revolution, but I’ll Tell You What Does by Steve Miranda • Khan Academy Is Not the Progressive Model You Are Looking For by Tom Barrett • It’s a Video Library, Not a Revolution by Diana Senechal • Content […]

[…] Khan Academy Is Not The Progressive Model You Are Looking For is from Tom Barrett. […]

[…] Barret heldur úti vefnum Edtech. Í færslunni Khan Academy Is Not The Progressive Model You Are Looking For heldur hann því fram að kennslumáti Khan Academy sé lítið annað en ný leið til að kenna […]

[…] of Reddit, Batman!) There’s been pushback to the idea of Sal Khan as math savior, with some educators questioning the Khan Academy approach to lecturing and learning. How can this really be the promise […]

[…] of Reddit, Batman!) There’s been pushback to the idea of Sal Khan as math savior, with some educators questioning the Khan Academy approach to lecturing and learning. How can this really be the promise […]

Great if you’ve got a population of motivated students and an army of brilliant teachers. Realistically, this kind of thinking is exactly why many kids are leaving school with a poor level of education. This wonderful idea of a ‘more meaningful and engaging’ education is not half as realistic as an individually catered, fast track, data rich eduction via KA. It is such a great tool, and so easy to integrate into classrooms.

Khan Academy will evolve. They are very open to new types of material such as game modules and simulations. KA’s goal is to be a platform where teachers can upload their own material. There will of cource also be a library of videoes that teachers and students can choose from. Instead of focusing on the limitations of present KA, wouldn’t it be more interesting to write a post where you share realistic thoughts on how KA can get better?

[…] Khan Academy Is Not The Progressive Model You Are Looking For | edte.ch […]

[…] I don’t see how Khan Academy can have a place in a creative curriculum model, at least not the model of instruction used, the resources themselves may have some value. But it all seems to be propping up a model that should be vanishing from our schools, not resurfacing. Khan Academy Is Not The Progressive Model You Are Looking For | edte.ch […]

I’d agree that we need to truly evaluate the Khan Academy. For me, the excitement about Khan Academy reflects that for a certain highly motivated math student, it offers free lectures. The problem sets and concept math are also intriguing. But for most students, it is brutally hard to absorb. It is pure problem-solving, not connected with real problems and not reflected of where we are headed with the Common Core. Khan has made instructional videos into a freely available commodity and while this is great, it is not educationally revolutionary.

John, Mayor of VocabSpellingCity.com